When Linden made their Viewer Open Source in 2007, i personally thought it was not a good idea.
Don’t they digg their own grave by doing this? I mean, since that moment others could take Linden’s
viewer and create their own virtual worlds – OpenSimulator was the logical consequences of this step.
Did Linden Labs not know that this will happen?
These days i know more. I read in an article on Reuters why Linden did that. Reuters interviewed Linden VIP
Joe Miller about the future of Second Life beside thousands of open grids. The answer is easy:
Linden knew from beginning that someday an other virtual world will arise(Blue Mars, Playstation Home,….) They knew, to stay on top of virtual worlds, they have to create a standard, that Second Life stays compatible to other virtual worlds. By making the viewer Open Source and letting others to implement Open Source Server Software, they make their position even stronger than before. Most of other virtual worlds use Lindens viewer as base for their own viewers, or try to stay compatible to Second Life to use standard viewers. For example 99% of Emerald Viewer is made by Linden Labs. The OpenSimulator Software is still alpha, and it will take some time to make it as stable and as scalable as Lindens own Server Software. Meanwhile Linden Labs can work on much detailed problems.
So while OpenSimulator Software is on its way to beta state, Linden Labs can use this time for marketing, making the Linden Dollar stronger, work on new features and make Second Life more stable and scalable. Finally they stay compatible to OpenSimulator and can even use new features for their own grid, at least they can use the ideas. The Snowglobe Viewer,
that is made by an OpenSource Community and Linden Labs, is the place where Linden can use new features of other Open Source Viewers.
Reuters wrote:
“It’s an evolution from a company that sells virtual land to the infrastructure backbone of a diverse array of OpenSim worlds.”
Joe Miller:
“I could see Linden offering economic services, trading services, search services, [...] ”
“[...]We look forward to the day when the value of entering the Second Life Grid will be clear over the value of entering an OpenSim grid,[...]”
It reminds me on the sitution of the Web Server Software market. On the one hand there is the Open Source Apache Server,
powerful, fast and expandable, but you must be a geek to get full control. On the other hand there is the commercial Software
Microsoft IIS, and although there are millions of Apache Installations out there, there are also million people that use Microsoft ISS.
Sources:
http://secondlife.reuters.com/stories/2008/07/11/interview-linden-prepares-for-an-opensim-future/
An Update:
Maria Korolov from hypergridbusiness pointed me to that OpenSim was not the direct consequence of making the SL viewer
OpenSource, which is correct i think. However, OpenSim profits massivly from this step.